The Document Which Warned that the Adyar
Society Had Abandoned Real Theosophy
A Master of the Wisdom
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Introductory Note
The document reproduced below is the complete text of the 1900 letter
from a Master, to Annie Besant. It was published for the first time in
“The Eclectic Theosophist”, number 101, September-October 1987, p. 1.
from a Master, to Annie Besant. It was published for the first time in
“The Eclectic Theosophist”, number 101, September-October 1987, p. 1.
Up to 1987, only the partial version of the letter was known, as
it had been published by C. Jinarajadasa in “Letters From the
Masters of the Wisdom” ( TPH, letter 46 of the first series).
it had been published by C. Jinarajadasa in “Letters From the
Masters of the Wisdom” ( TPH, letter 46 of the first series).
If we consider the extremely relevant content of the letter,
one question is unavoidable: “why has its text received such
a scarce attention, even after its full text was published in 1987?"
There seem to be strong political reasons for that. On one hand,
it does not seem politically profitable for the leaders of the
Adyar Society to admit that their Society has ever since 1900
obviously done exactly the opposite of what the Letter recommends.
The text shows in a frank and direct language that the esoteric section
of the Adyar Society was already out of line and out of focus since
earlier than 1900. It is easy to see that it has remained so up to now.
one question is unavoidable: “why has its text received such
a scarce attention, even after its full text was published in 1987?"
There seem to be strong political reasons for that. On one hand,
it does not seem politically profitable for the leaders of the
Adyar Society to admit that their Society has ever since 1900
obviously done exactly the opposite of what the Letter recommends.
The text shows in a frank and direct language that the esoteric section
of the Adyar Society was already out of line and out of focus since
earlier than 1900. It is easy to see that it has remained so up to now.
On the other hand, some students of William Q. Judge have their own
reasons to question the authenticity of the letter. They correctly point
out that by 1900 Annie Besant should not be a disciple of the Masters any
longer. She had broken her solemn vows by publishing for the wide
public as part of her unlegitimate version of “The Secret Doctrine”
the Esoteric School Papers she had recently made a sacred promise to
keep private and never to divulge. She had also forced Mr. William
Q. Judge (one of the three main founders of the movement in 1875)
out from the Adyar Society. And, unfortunately, even that was not all.
Mrs. Besant belonged to the “inner group” of Mr. Alfred P. Sinnett, who
made mesmeric and mediumnistic sessions with false Adepts, inLondon .
reasons to question the authenticity of the letter. They correctly point
out that by 1900 Annie Besant should not be a disciple of the Masters any
longer. She had broken her solemn vows by publishing for the wide
public as part of her unlegitimate version of “The Secret Doctrine”
the Esoteric School Papers she had recently made a sacred promise to
keep private and never to divulge. She had also forced Mr. William
Q. Judge (one of the three main founders of the movement in 1875)
out from the Adyar Society. And, unfortunately, even that was not all.
Mrs. Besant belonged to the “inner group” of Mr. Alfred P. Sinnett, who
made mesmeric and mediumnistic sessions with false Adepts, in
For these students of William Judge, therefore, if Annie Besant was no
disciple any longer by 1900, the Masters could not communicate with her
in any form. As a conclusion, they say that the letter must be a forgery
made by someone in the Adyar Society who was against Annie Besant.
disciple any longer by 1900, the Masters could not communicate with her
in any form. As a conclusion, they say that the letter must be a forgery
made by someone in the Adyar Society who was against Annie Besant.
So, for different reasons, both Adyar students and some Judge students
tend to completely ignore the 1900 letter – or to give it scarce attention.
tend to completely ignore the 1900 letter – or to give it scarce attention.
Yet the fact remains that this letter anticipates, one by one, most of the
many mistakes and absurdities which would be done by the Adyar
leaders in the following decades, including the creation of
an “esoteric popery” and the cessation of any criticisms against
conventional dogmatic religions. Such criticism was part of the original
programme of the theosophical movement created by H.P. Blavatsky.
many mistakes and absurdities which would be done by the Adyar
leaders in the following decades, including the creation of
an “esoteric popery” and the cessation of any criticisms against
conventional dogmatic religions. Such criticism was part of the original
programme of the theosophical movement created by H.P. Blavatsky.
Another factor to be considered in the equation is that the ways and methods
of the Masters are often difficult to predict or ascertain, as H.P.B. herself
warned. They are at liberty to keep in contact with non-disciples and ex-disciples.
On the other hand, Masters often do not give instructions to their true disciples,
so that these students may develop their own independent vision of things.
of the Masters are often difficult to predict or ascertain, as H.P.B. herself
warned. They are at liberty to keep in contact with non-disciples and ex-disciples.
On the other hand, Masters often do not give instructions to their true disciples,
so that these students may develop their own independent vision of things.
In the book “Mahatma Letters”, one can see examples of the fact
that Masters may keep some contact with an ex-disciple after he or
she completely “failed” – and this, for several karmic reasons.
that Masters may keep some contact with an ex-disciple after he or
she completely “failed” – and this, for several karmic reasons.
Another possible hint as to the authenticity of the 1900 letter is
that it was sent in the exact year and month when the Aquarius
Age started, possibly being a ‘last farewell’ to be understood only
from a historical perspective. For some reason this letter was
never destroyed, and for some reason it came to be widely known
only during the “general effort” of the following end-of-century,
in 1987. The letter gives precious hints for the theosophical
work to be done from that date, and is it hoped that in due time it
will receive proper attention by students worldwide. As any reader
can see, the content of the letters speaks for itself – as to its value.
that it was sent in the exact year and month when the Aquarius
Age started, possibly being a ‘last farewell’ to be understood only
from a historical perspective. For some reason this letter was
never destroyed, and for some reason it came to be widely known
only during the “general effort” of the following end-of-century,
in 1987. The letter gives precious hints for the theosophical
work to be done from that date, and is it hoped that in due time it
will receive proper attention by students worldwide. As any reader
can see, the content of the letters speaks for itself – as to its value.
The complete document is below. All the words and sentences which
were omitted by C. Jinarajadasa are here included in CAPITAL LETTERS.
were omitted by C. Jinarajadasa are here included in CAPITAL LETTERS.
(Carlos Cardoso Aveline)
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
A psychic and a pranayamist who has got confused by the vagaries of the members. The T.S. and its members are slowly manufacturing a creed. Says a Thibetan proverb 'credulity breeds credulity and ends in hypocrisy.' How few are they who can know anything about us. Are we to be propitiated and made idols of. IS THE WORSHIP OF A NEW TRINITY MADE UP OF THE BLESSED M., UPASIKA AND YOURSELF TO TAKE THE PLACE OF EXPLODED CREEDS. WE ASK NOT FOR THE WORSHIP OF OURSELVES. THE DISCIPLE SHOULD
K.H.
NOTE:
[1] In “The Eclectic Theosophist” transcription of this letter, the word 'each' is omitted but the original letter has this word. See the photofacsimile of the actual letter.
000000000000000000000000000000000
The full text of the above document was also published in the “Theosophical History” magazine, London , October 1987, see pp. 115-117.
000000000000000000000000000000000